Article Figures & Data
Figures
- Figure 1 The Interactive Stepwise Case Flow
Cases opened with a history of present illness, followed by physical examination findings, imaging and/or laboratory values, and concluded with a discussion on diagnosis and treatment including hyperlinks to further material and references. Optional questions are dispersed throughout the steps of the case.
- Figure 2 Assessment of Participant Satisfaction
Exit survey results revealed that students overall thought highly of the neuro-ophthalmology learning tool and interactive workshop.
- Figure 3 Participant Perception of 20/20 SIM Case Difficulty
Most of the students (77%, n = 67) reported the difficulty of the 20/20 SIM neuro-ophthalmology cases were “just right.” Approximately 11% (n = 10) rated the cases as “challenging” (n = 9) or “very challenging” (n = 1), and the remainder thought the cases were “easy” (n = 10). None thought the tool was “too easy.”
- Figure 4 Participant Rating of the 20/20 SIM Tool
Most (85%, n = 75) of the students rated the 20/20 SIM learning tool positively, with 63% (n = 55) describing it as a “good” and 23% (n = 20) as an “excellent” learning tool. Approximately 2% (n = 2) rated the tool as “poor,” and the remainder (n = 11, 13%) were neutral. None rated it as “very poor.”
Tables
Name Location Contribution Emma M. Loebel, MD Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City Analyzed and interpreted the data, drafted and revised article for intellectual content Laura K. Stein, MD, MPH Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City Designed and conceptualized the study, revised article for intellectual content Michael Fara, MD, PhD Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City Revised article for intellectual content, major role in acquisition of data Samira Farouk, MD Department of Nephrology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City Revised article for intellectual content Nisha Chadha, MD Department of Ophthalmology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City Designed and conceptualized the study, revised article for intellectual content
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Cutaneous α-Synuclein Signatures in Patients With Multiple System Atrophy and Parkinson Disease
Dr. Rizwan S. Akhtar and Dr. Sarah Brooker